Every conversation a company has produces commitments. The decision takes a second. The follow-up takes a fortnight.
Someone will send the deck. Someone will confirm the date. Someone will check whether the thing we shipped last week actually worked. Between those two moments sit hours of quiet inefficiency, and that is the part Actions takes off you. The commitment is rarely the hard part. Keeping hold of it is.
Capability is not the bottleneck. Adoption is.
Models crossed the threshold for our work a while ago. They can read a messy transcript, tell a real commitment from a hypothetical, and draft the follow-up better than most of us manage at 6pm on a Thursday. So why does it still fall to us?
Adoption is moving far slower than capability, and not because teams are sceptical. The cost of entry is still a new tool, a new habit, a migration, a vocabulary, an afternoon of setup that nobody has. The problem is friction rather than intelligence.
Meet the work where it already happens
So we build in the opposite direction. Not a destination to visit, but a layer that attaches to the places work is already discussed: the call, the thread, the notes you were going to take anyway. Nothing to migrate, no process to redesign, no prompt to get right.
Your calendar already knows about the meeting. Your tools already hold the work. Actions' job is to close the distance between them, quietly, so the value of a conversation survives the conversation.
Judgement is the part that stays human
Automation earns trust by being reviewable, not by being confident. Agents draft, prepare and execute. People decide. Every action arrives with what it was drawn from and what it intends to do, and nothing leaves the building unapproved.
This is not caution for its own sake. People keep the judgement, agents take the labour, and that trade should feel like leverage rather than a loss of control.
For everyone. Just sign up and let Actions do the rest.
The benefits of AI often reach the most technical of us first. We think that is the real risk: not that AI moves too fast, but that it arrives unevenly.
So the test we hold ourselves to is simple. You should not have to care how any of it works. You should just get the small, annoying jobs off your plate, and your afternoon back.
From conversation to completion
Follow-up is where companies lose hours, and we would love to give you that back.
Get started free →